Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Broccoli yield reached 30.07 Mg ha−1, 143.87% above control.
Treatmenthumic acid, incorporating poultry manure, plant calcium spraying e0 Not reported Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Interactor role Second interactor Second interactor role Setting
Verbatim
e0 “humic acid, incorporating poultry manure, plant calcium spraying, their interactions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–704 e1 “plant yield reached 30.07 Mg ha −1 , representing a remarkable of 143.87% compared to control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1141 e2 “growth and yield of broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–154 Other claims from this paper (4) Record rev-07e52bcf8e9f4ebe4c07637df3c3aed3ff7b71241c43021cd8d232515815cee2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer
calcium atom · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage) Positive and negative results 10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction
no effect negative positive positive positive positive positive positive 1 paper more in this group
See all 10 papers → other · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage) Results differ 37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect
32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction
no effect no effect no effect negative positive positive positive positive 28 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers → application · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage) Positive and negative results 110 papers: 104 positive, 6 negative or no effect
103 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction
positive no effect no effect negative no effect negative no effect positive 101 papers more in this group
See all 110 papers → 3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.