Paper · 2022 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Leaf gas exchanges and production of kale under Ca(NO3)2 concentrations in salinized nutrient solution

Daisy D. da Silva; Francisco de A. de Oliveira; Louize Nascimento; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Adequate mineral supplementation can be a strategy to enable the use of brackish water in the production of vegetables. This study intended to evaluate the effect of calcium nitrate concentrations on leaf gas exchanges and yield of kale (Brassica oleracea L) fertigated with salinized nutrient solutions. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block experimental design (4 + 1), with four replicates. Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish water (6.0 dS m-1) containing four concentrations of Ca(NO3)2 [(750, 1,125, 1,500, and 1,875 mg L-1)] and a control treatment (standard nutrient solution using low-salinity water, 0.5 dS m-1 (750 mg L-1 of Ca(NO3)2) were used in the study. The following analyses were performed: leaf gas exchanges, leaf area, and fresh matter yield. The standard nutrient solution promoted higher values for photosynthetic rate (13.06 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (0.19 mol H2O m-2 s-1), transpiration (2.76 mmol H2O m-2 s-1), instantaneous water use efficiency (4.73 mmol CO2 mol-1 H2O), instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (0.053 mmol CO2 mol-1 CO2), leaf area (2.78 cm2 per plant), and leaf fresh matter yield (2.64 kg per plant). The Ca(NO3)2 not nullified but mitigated the deleterious effect of salt stress on leaf gas exchanges, except for kale yield (leaf fresh matter).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard nutrient solution gave the highest photosynthetic rate in kale.

Treatment
standard nutrient solutione0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.06 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1e0
Comparator
Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The standard nutrient solution promoted higher values for photosynthetic rate (13.06 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish water (6.0 dS m-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“a control treatment (standard nutrient solution using low-salinity water, 0.5 dS m-1 (750 mg L-1 of Ca(NO3)2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard nutrient solution gave higher stomatal conductance in kale.

Treatment
standard nutrient solutione0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.19 mol H2O m-2 s-1e0
Comparator
Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The standard nutrient solution promoted higher values for photosynthetic rate (13.06 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (0.19 mol H2O m-2 s-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–942 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard nutrient solution gave higher transpiration in kale.

Treatment
standard nutrient solutione0
Outcome
transpiratione0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.76 mmol H2O m-2 s-1e0
Comparator
Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The standard nutrient solution promoted higher values for photosynthetic rate (13.06 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (0.19 mol H2O m-2 s-1), transpiration (2.76 mmol H2O m-2 s-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard nutrient solution gave higher instantaneous water use efficiency in kale.

Treatment
standard nutrient solutione0
Outcome
instantaneous water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.73 mmol CO2 mol-1 H2Oe0
Comparator
Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The standard nutrient solution promoted higher values for photosynthetic rate (13.06 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (0.19 mol H2O m-2 s-1), transpiration (2.76 mmol H2O m-2 s-1), instantaneous water use efficiency (4.73 mmol CO2 mol-1 H2O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1043 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard nutrient solution gave higher instantaneous carboxylation efficiency in kale.

Treatment
standard nutrient solutione0
Outcome
instantaneous carboxylation efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.053 mmol CO2 mol-1 CO2e0
Comparator
Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The standard nutrient solution promoted higher values for photosynthetic rate (13.06 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (0.19 mol H2O m-2 s-1), transpiration (2.76 mmol H2O m-2 s-1), instantaneous water use efficiency (4.73 mmol CO2 mol-1 H2O), instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (0.053 mmol CO2 mol-1 CO2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard nutrient solution gave higher kale leaf area.

Treatment
standard nutrient solutione0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.78 cm2 per plante0
Comparator
Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The standard nutrient solution promoted higher values for photosynthetic rate (13.06 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (0.19 mol H2O m-2 s-1), transpiration (2.76 mmol H2O m-2 s-1), instantaneous water use efficiency (4.73 mmol CO2 mol-1 H2O), instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (0.053 mmol CO2 mol-1 CO2), leaf area (2.78 cm2 per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard nutrient solution gave higher kale leaf fresh matter yield.

Treatment
standard nutrient solutione0
Outcome
leaf fresh matter yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.64 kg per plante0
Comparator
Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The standard nutrient solution promoted higher values for photosynthetic rate (13.06 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (0.19 mol H2O m-2 s-1), transpiration (2.76 mmol H2O m-2 s-1), instantaneous water use efficiency (4.73 mmol CO2 mol-1 H2O), instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (0.053 mmol CO2 mol-1 CO2), leaf area (2.78 cm2 per plant), and leaf fresh matter yield (2.64 kg per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1191 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four nutrient solutions prepared in brackish water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate mitigated salt stress effects on kale leaf gas exchange.

Treatment
Ca(NO3)2e0
Outcome
leaf gas exchangese0
Direction
mitigatede0
Qualifier
not nullifiede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Ca(NO3)2 not nullified but mitigated the deleterious effect of salt stress on leaf gas exchanges, except for kale yield (leaf fresh matter)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate did not mitigate the salt effect on kale leaf fresh matter yield.

Treatment
Ca(NO3)2e0
Outcome
kale yield (leaf fresh matter)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Ca(NO3)2 not nullified but mitigated the deleterious effect of salt stress on leaf gas exchanges, except for kale yield (leaf fresh matter)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1336 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · physiology: gas exchange · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

264 papers: 240 positive, 24 negative or no effect

239 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

260 papers more in this group

See all 264 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.