Abstract
Abstract Sonic bloom was a technology that used sound waves at 07.00–11.00 a.m. in the western part of Indonesia with a particular frequency to stimulate plant growth. This study aims to determine the effectiveness and best time for applying the foliar fertilizer with sound waves to cabbage plants. This research was conducted in Kuta Gugung Village, Naman Teran District, Karo Regency, from September 1 st , 2020, to December 9 th , 2020. The research method was a non-factorial randomized block design with four treatments and five replications, namely: application sound waves without fertilization (control), fertilization at 1 hour before application sound waves, fertilization carried out simultaneously with application sound waves, and fertilization carried out 1 hour after application sound waves. The results showed that the application of foliar fertilizer with sound waves significantly affected stomata exposure, making fertilizer more effective. To get the best stomata exposure, it was at 8.30 a.m., but the average selling weight of the crop was not significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar fertilizer applied with sound waves significantly affected stomata exposure of cabbage, making the fertilizer more effective than the control.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- application of foliar fertilizer with sound wavese1
- Outcome
- stomata exposuree1
- Comparator
- application sound waves without fertilization (control)e2
- Setting
- Kuta Gugung Village, Naman Teran District, Karo Regencye5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cabbage”
e1“the application of foliar fertilizer with sound waves significantly affected stomata exposure, making fertilizer more effective”
e2“application sound waves without fertilization (control)”
e5“This research was conducted in Kuta Gugung Village, Naman Teran District, Karo Regency”
Claim · model-written summary
The best stomata exposure of cabbage was at 8.30 a.m. in the sound-wave fertilizer timing trial.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Outcome
- best stomata exposuree3
- Value
- 8.30 a.m.e3
- Setting
- Kuta Gugung Village, Naman Teran District, Karo Regencye5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cabbage”
e3“To get the best stomata exposure, it was at 8.30 a.m.”
e5“This research was conducted in Kuta Gugung Village, Naman Teran District, Karo Regency”
Claim · model-written summary
Average selling weight of cabbage did not differ significantly with the timing of sound-wave foliar fertilizer application.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- application of foliar fertilizer with sound wavese1
- Outcome
- average selling weight of the crope4
- Comparator
- application sound waves without fertilization (control)e2
- Setting
- Kuta Gugung Village, Naman Teran District, Karo Regencye5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cabbage”
e1“the application of foliar fertilizer with sound waves significantly affected stomata exposure, making fertilizer more effective”
e2“application sound waves without fertilization (control)”
e4“but the average selling weight of the crop was not significant”
e5“This research was conducted in Kuta Gugung Village, Naman Teran District, Karo Regency”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · physiology: gas exchange · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.