Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Guava extract had higher total phenolic content, 121.6 mg GAE/g, than chameli.

A claim from Antiulcer Properties of Guava and Chameli Leaves: A Phytochemical Exploration for Oral Ulcer Management · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava extract had higher total phenolic content, 121.6 mg GAE/g, than chameli.

Taxon
Psidium guajavaPsidium guajavae0
Treatment
Guava extracte1
Outcome
total phenolic contente1
Direction
highere1
Value
121.6 mg GAE/ge1
Comparator
Chamelie1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Psidium guajava (Guava) and Jasminum grandiflorum (Chameli) leaves for oral ulcer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–140
e1

“Guava extract exhibited higher total phenolic content (121.6 mg GAE/g) and comparable flavonoid content (280 mg QE/g) to Chameli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1039

Title

Antiulcer Properties of Guava and Chameli Leaves: A Phytochemical Exploration for Oral Ulcer Management

Jaithliya Deepali; Nutan Rajput; Bhawar Falguni; et al. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences 2024. doi:10.26452/ijrps.v15i3.4692

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-0885195b677dfd07fac89d1838a04395b626621d708a624bcc953ae6c2dd93c4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

botanical · quality: phytochemicals · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.