Intervention effectmodel-written summary

2.5% Si-BC2 significantly improved leaf and tiller numbers and spikelet number compared with control.

A claim from Effect of silicon nanoparticle-based biochar on wheat growth, antioxidants and nutrients concentration under salinity stress · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2.5% Si-BC2 significantly improved leaf and tiller numbers and spikelet number compared with control.

Treatment
2.5% Si-BC2e1
Outcome
number of leaves, number of tillers, number of spikeletse0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhancement in shoot and root length, shoot and root fresh weight, shoot and root dry weight, number of leaves, number of tillers, number of spikelets, spike length, spike fresh and dry weight compared to control under no stress and salinity stress (200 mM NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1080
e1

“treatment 2.5% Si-BC2 performed significantly better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–809
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53

Title

Effect of silicon nanoparticle-based biochar on wheat growth, antioxidants and nutrients concentration under salinity stress

Sidra Gill; Musarrat Ramzan; Gul Naz; et al. Scientific Reports 2024. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55924-7

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-08d93a5ebaef4a2b33a18b0dc63ac93cd186b958dc8b892b02cf0d90e145a131 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.