Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Garlic growth and productivity responded positively to the 2/3 compost/soil ratio with 30 g mycorrhiza compared with the 1/3 ratio with 30 g mycorrhiza under field conditions.

A claim from Differential Responses of Allium sativum. (L) (Alliaceae) to Compost Application and Mycorrhizal Inoculation Under Field Conditions · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic growth and productivity responded positively to the 2/3 compost/soil ratio with 30 g mycorrhiza compared with the 1/3 ratio with 30 g mycorrhiza under field conditions.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume1
Treatment
integrated application of 2/3 ratio (compost/soil) inoculated with 30g mycorrhizae1
Interactor
mycorrhizae1symbiont
Outcome
growth and productivitye1
Direction
positively respondede1
Comparator
1/3 (compost/soil) ratio +30 g AMFe0
Setting
field conditionse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“where the main treatment 2/3 (compost/soil) ratio +30 g AMF was compared to 1/3 (compost/soil) ratio +30 g AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–510
e1

“The growth and productivity of garlic positively responded and in repeated cropping campaigns to the integrated application of 2/3 ratio (compost/soil) inoculated with 30g mycorrhiza”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–905
e2

“whether this performance can also be successful under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–219

Title

Differential Responses of Allium sativum. (L) (Alliaceae) to Compost Application and Mycorrhizal Inoculation Under Field Conditions

Inna Maryamou; Delphine Nguemo Dongock; Richard Tobolbaï; et al. World Journal of Agricultural Research 2024. doi:10.12691/wjar-12-2-2

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-096b03d2f9c8bbc66b4c2dbabd4d1c35e3b24b08f3a335e36cfebf462196328c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

inoculation · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 29 positive, 1 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.