Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage grain yield was 8324 kg ha-1 and significantly higher.

A claim from Impact of Tillage and Nitrogen Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Rabi Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage grain yield was 8324 kg ha-1 and significantly higher.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8324 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
statistically on pare0
Comparator
reduced tillage treatmente0
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, Karimnagare1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize cultivation under conventional tillage recorded significantly higher grain yield (8324 kg ha-1) which is statistically on par with reduced tillage treatment (7775 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–548
e1

“Agricultural Research Station, Karimnagar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–97

Title

Impact of Tillage and Nitrogen Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Rabi Maize (Zea mays L.)

N. Jyosthna; G. Manjulatha; N. Mahesh; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i103096

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-0a3bcfe08fcda2636faec4a7eef830c0e70f897cb0109eb05f523f109dbf1d61 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.