Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The optimum combination increased blooming dates and flower diameter.

A claim from Effects of Different Treatments on Blooming Characteristics of Potted Dual-purpose Peach · 2006

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum combination increased blooming dates and flower diameter.

Treatment
Medium 2,full root with earth and gibberellin 100 mg/Le0
Outcome
blooming dates and flower diametere0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Medium 2,full root with earth and gibberellin 100 mg/L was optimum combination in the experiment,which could make blooming phenophase ahead of schedule,increase blooming dates and flower diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–612
t0

“Potted Dual-purpose Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–88

Title

Effects of Different Treatments on Blooming Characteristics of Potted Dual-purpose Peach

Wei Hu Nonwood Forest Research 2006

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-0bee2b767354a1c8f224bd1cd5a276a4ad2d86a5fcc9b991f30e42f92b66fce1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

class · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

in vitro · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.