Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar application of water-soluble macro and micro nutrient fertilizers significantly improved dry matter production, number of pods per plant and pod weight compared with RDF alone.

A claim from Foliar Nutrition with Water Soluble Macro and Micro Nutrient Fertilizers for Yield Maximization in Bush Vegetable Cowpea · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of water-soluble macro and micro nutrient fertilizers significantly improved dry matter production, number of pods per plant and pod weight compared with RDF alone.

Treatment
RDF + foliar application of water-soluble macro and micro nutrient fertilizerse1
Outcome
dry matter production, number of pods per plant and pod weighte1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
RDF alonee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bush Vegetable Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–120
e1

“Results revealed that compared to RDF alone, RDF + foliar application of water-soluble macro and micro nutrient fertilizers at 45 DAS significantly improved the dry matter production, number of pods per plant and pod weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1267

Title

Foliar Nutrition with Water Soluble Macro and Micro Nutrient Fertilizers for Yield Maximization in Bush Vegetable Cowpea

R.K. Krishnasree; Sheeja K. Raj; P. Shalini Pillai; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2021. doi:10.18805/lr-4761

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-0cb2ebfe6cd45d465719feb9b4db5558c2cb570fed9a69e86582e72923a23892 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

micronutrient · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

283 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.