Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 100% urea variant gave the highest average potato yield, 40.95 t/ha, significantly above the other fertilisation variants.

A claim from The effect of urea with urease inhibitors and urea on yield and nitrate content in potato tubers · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% urea variant gave the highest average potato yield, 40.95 t/ha, significantly above the other fertilisation variants.

Treatment
100% of ureae0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
40.95 t.ha-1e0
Comparator
other variants of fertilizatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The obtained results show that the highest average yield has been achieved in the variant of 100% of urea - 40.95 t.ha-1, the yield of this variant was statistically significantly higher than the yield of the other variants of fertilization (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1036
t0

“nitrate content in potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–96

Title

The effect of urea with urease inhibitors and urea on yield and nitrate content in potato tubers

Karel Drápal; Miroslav Jůzl; Petr Elzner; et al. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 2013. doi:10.11118/actaun201361061613

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-0dfab554df5d559579043ddb64d182615c97eca6c6d987c4c8876b4d78e954f8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.