Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soybean seed yield was significantly higher under conventional tillage than under reduced or strip tillage

A claim from Soil N‐related properties under soybean ( Glycine max L. Merrill) cultivation as affected by different soil tillage systems and seasonal changes · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean seed yield was significantly higher under conventional tillage than under reduced or strip tillage

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
CTe1
Outcome
soybean seed yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
RT or STe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed yield of soybean ( Glycine max . (L.) Merrill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1321
e1

“In 2017, the average soybean seed yield was twice as high (2.42 t ha −1 ) as in the other 2 years (mean 0.87 t ha −1 ) and was significantly higher in CT than in RT or ST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1946

Title

Soil N‐related properties under soybean ( Glycine max L. Merrill) cultivation as affected by different soil tillage systems and seasonal changes

Jacek Długosz; Anna Piotrowska‐Długosz Soil Use and Management 2024. doi:10.1111/sum.13138

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-1036d202f8a2f0ff32baeb65920cc95258396471c1cf3438d25f8cfcf0fb2da3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

381 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.