Paper · 2023 · Plants

No-Tillage System Can Improve Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System

Gustavo Ferreira da Silva; Juliano Carlos Calonego; Bruno Cesar Ottoboni Luperini; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil management systems can directly interfere with crop yield via changes in the soil's physical and hydraulic properties. However, short- to medium-term experiments of conduction do not always demonstrate the modifications of the management systems in these properties. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the physical properties of the soil in a long-term management system and to relate it to the storage and availability of water to plants, verifying its effect on soybean yield. The experiment was conducted in randomized blocks in a split-plot scheme with four replications. Plots were composed by soil management (conventional tillage and no-tillage), and subplots represented three soil depths (0.0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, and 0.2-0.4 m). The soil's physical and hydraulic properties, root development, and soybean yield were evaluated. The no-tillage system not only presented higher bulk density and soil resistance to compaction up to a depth of 0.2 m but also greater root development. This management also did not affect the process of water infiltration in the soil and presented an increase in soybean grain yield by 6.5%. The long-term no-tillage system (33 years) offers less risk of water stress to soybean plants; it contributes to greater grain yield of this crop when compared to the conventional tillage system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased soil bulk density up to 0.2 m.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no-tillage systeme0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
up to a depth of 0.2 me0
Comparator
Conventional Tillage Systemt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The no-tillage system not only presented higher bulk density and soil resistance to compaction up to a depth of 0.2 m but also greater root development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased soil compaction resistance up to 0.2 m.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no-tillage systeme0
Outcome
soil resistance to compactione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
up to a depth of 0.2 me0
Comparator
Conventional Tillage Systemt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The no-tillage system not only presented higher bulk density and soil resistance to compaction up to a depth of 0.2 m but also greater root development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased soybean root development.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no-tillage systeme0
Outcome
root developmente0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Conventional Tillage Systemt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The no-tillage system not only presented higher bulk density and soil resistance to compaction up to a depth of 0.2 m but also greater root development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage did not affect soil water infiltration.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
No-Tillage Systemt0
Outcome
water infiltration in the soile0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
Conventional Tillage Systemt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This management also did not affect the process of water infiltration in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“No-Tillage System Can Improve Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased soybean grain yield by 6.5%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
No-Tillage Systemt0
Outcome
soybean grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6.5%e0
Comparator
Conventional Tillage Systemt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“presented an increase in soybean grain yield by 6.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“No-Tillage System Can Improve Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 33 years of no-tillage lowers soybean water-stress risk relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
no-tillage systeme0
Outcome
risk of water stresse0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
33 yearse0
Comparator
conventional tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The long-term no-tillage system (33 years) offers less risk of water stress to soybean plants; it contributes to greater grain yield of this crop when compared to the conventional tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1332 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

84 papers: 52 positive, 32 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.