Abstract
Soil management systems can directly interfere with crop yield via changes in the soil's physical and hydraulic properties. However, short- to medium-term experiments of conduction do not always demonstrate the modifications of the management systems in these properties. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the physical properties of the soil in a long-term management system and to relate it to the storage and availability of water to plants, verifying its effect on soybean yield. The experiment was conducted in randomized blocks in a split-plot scheme with four replications. Plots were composed by soil management (conventional tillage and no-tillage), and subplots represented three soil depths (0.0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, and 0.2-0.4 m). The soil's physical and hydraulic properties, root development, and soybean yield were evaluated. The no-tillage system not only presented higher bulk density and soil resistance to compaction up to a depth of 0.2 m but also greater root development. This management also did not affect the process of water infiltration in the soil and presented an increase in soybean grain yield by 6.5%. The long-term no-tillage system (33 years) offers less risk of water stress to soybean plants; it contributes to greater grain yield of this crop when compared to the conventional tillage system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage increased soil bulk density up to 0.2 m.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- bulk densitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- up to a depth of 0.2 me0
- Comparator
- Conventional Tillage Systemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The no-tillage system not only presented higher bulk density and soil resistance to compaction up to a depth of 0.2 m but also greater root development.”
t0“Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage increased soil compaction resistance up to 0.2 m.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- soil resistance to compactione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- up to a depth of 0.2 me0
- Comparator
- Conventional Tillage Systemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The no-tillage system not only presented higher bulk density and soil resistance to compaction up to a depth of 0.2 m but also greater root development.”
t0“Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage increased soybean root development.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- root developmente0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- Conventional Tillage Systemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The no-tillage system not only presented higher bulk density and soil resistance to compaction up to a depth of 0.2 m but also greater root development.”
t0“Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage did not affect soil water infiltration.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- No-Tillage Systemt0
- Outcome
- water infiltration in the soile0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Comparator
- Conventional Tillage Systemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“This management also did not affect the process of water infiltration in the soil”
t0“No-Tillage System Can Improve Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage increased soybean grain yield by 6.5%.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- No-Tillage Systemt0
- Outcome
- soybean grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 6.5%e0
- Comparator
- Conventional Tillage Systemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“presented an increase in soybean grain yield by 6.5%.”
t0“No-Tillage System Can Improve Soybean Grain Production More Than Conventional Tillage System”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that 33 years of no-tillage lowers soybean water-stress risk relative to conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- no-tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- risk of water stresse0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Qualifier
- 33 yearse0
- Comparator
- conventional tillage systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The long-term no-tillage system (33 years) offers less risk of water stress to soybean plants; it contributes to greater grain yield of this crop when compared to the conventional tillage system.”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
80 papers more in this group
See all 84 papers →tillage · soil: physics · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.