Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis fell 70–80% in the two severest treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- two most severe waterlogging treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Light-saturated net photosynthesise0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 70–80%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Light-saturated net photosynthesis was reduced by 70–80% for the two most severe waterlogging treatments”
t0“wheat”
Title
Al Imran Malik; Timothy D. Colmer; Hans Lambers; et al. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 2001. doi:10.1071/pp01089
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Shoot relative growth rate fell by 6–27% under waterlogging.
- Intervention effect Root relative growth rate fell by 15–74% under waterlogging.
- Association Growth declined as water level rose.
- Intervention effect Photosynthesis was little affected at 200 mm below the surface.
- Intervention effect Adventitious root number rose up to 1.5 times.
- Intervention effect Tiller number fell by 24–62%.
- Observation Adventitious roots penetrated only 85–116 mm below water.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging increased root porosity up to tenfold.
- Observation Porosity also rose in basal roots above water when younger tissue entered waterlogging.
- Observation Growth rates recovered after drainage at the 200 mm depth.
- Observation Growth recovered only partially after more severe waterlogging.