Claim · model-written summary
FYM and urea+FYM gave a lower benefit cost ratio (BCR) than urea treatment.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The maize (Zea mays L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system (MWCS) could be better alternative to rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)”
e3“The BCR was higher in NOCU and Urea+NI as compared to urea treatment; however, it was lower in FYM and urea+FYM”
Title
R K FAGODIYA; H PATHAK; A BHATIA; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2020. doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i1.98535
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Urea+NI lowered GWP of the maize-wheat system by 6% relative to urea treatment.
- Intervention effect NOCU lowered GWP of the maize-wheat system by 16% relative to urea treatment.
- Intervention effect Urea+FYM lowered GWP of the maize-wheat system by 31% relative to urea treatment.
- Intervention effect FYM lowered GWP of the maize-wheat system by 62% relative to urea treatment.
- Intervention effect Urea+NI lowered greenhouse gas intensity (GHGi) of the maize-wheat system by 6%.
- Intervention effect NOCU lowered greenhouse gas intensity (GHGi) of the maize-wheat system by 6%.
- Intervention effect Urea+FYM lowered greenhouse gas intensity (GHGi) of the maize-wheat system by 24%.
- Intervention effect FYM lowered greenhouse gas intensity (GHGi) of the maize-wheat system by 46%.
- Intervention effect NOCU and Urea+NI gave a higher benefit cost ratio (BCR) than urea treatment.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that NOCU can mitigate GWP and lower GHGi with a higher BCR in the maize-wheat system.