Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cyanobacterial inoculation enhanced peanut growth and yield.

A claim from INTEGRATED EFFECT OF N-FORMS IN MINERAL AND ORGANIC WITH OR WITHOUT SYANOBACTERIA INOCULATION ON IMPROVING PEANUT PRODUCTIVITY · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyanobacterial inoculation enhanced peanut growth and yield.

Treatment
cyanobacteria inoculatione0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cyanobacteria inoculation was better in enhancing the growth and yield of peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–731
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113

Title

INTEGRATED EFFECT OF N-FORMS IN MINERAL AND ORGANIC WITH OR WITHOUT SYANOBACTERIA INOCULATION ON IMPROVING PEANUT PRODUCTIVITY

S. M. Ahmed; G. A. M. El- Sayed; F. M. Ghazal; et al. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2007. doi:10.21608/jssae.2007.201612

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-16633b29b16ef9dcf83d4b7cd0bd2f0d4ac81519b5113b6b570a489cb5bb3f48 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Cyanobacteriota · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    Yield parameters PP and SW were boosted in experimental groundnut treatments E1-E6 compared with NPK and control.

    Influence of Biofertilizer Mixed Flower Waste Vermicompost on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea) · 2014 · compared with commercial NPK fertilizers (E7) and control (CO)

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Cyanobacteria inoculation significantly increased peanut and grain yields compared with uninoculated treatments.

    Influence of Cyanobacterial Inoculum on the Growth Features and Yield of Peanut Plants in Sandy Soil · 2022 · compared with uninoculated treatments

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Cyanobacterial inoculation significantly increased peanut and grain yields over uninoculated treatments.

    Impact of Cyanobacterial Inoculant on Growth and Productivity of Peanut Plants in Sandy Soil · 2022 · compared with uninoculated treatments

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Bradyrhizobium and cyanobacteria coinoculation increased grain productivity by 19% versus uninoculated control in clayey soil.

    Does coinoculation with bradyrhizobia and cyanobacteria improve groundnut growth and yield? · 2024 · compared with noninoculated control

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Cyanobacteria inoculation increased peanut yield and nutrient content.

    EFFECT OF CYANOBACTERIA, AND PHOSPHATE DISOLING BACTERIA INOCULATION ON IMPROVING PEANUT PRODUCTIVITY IN PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF DIFERENT RATES OF ROCK PHOSPHAE FERTILIZER UNDER SANDY SOIL CONDITION · 2008 · compared with uninoculated treatments

    Same direction

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

221 papers: 198 positive, 23 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Neither inoculation type significantly increased pod yield.

    Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response to inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. in soils of Argentina · 2006

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Peanut plants inoculated only with M. phaseolina had the lowest production, 0.67 ± 0.01 t/ha−1.

    Biological Control of Charcoal Rot in Peanut Crop through Strains of Trichoderma spp., in Puebla, Mexico · 2021

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Herbicides, nematicide, and inoculant had no significant effect on peanut yield, sound mature kernels, or ether extract.

    Effects of Herbicides, a Nematicide and Rhizobium Inoculant on Yield, Chemical Composition and Nodulation of Starr Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.)1 · 1976

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    G. et. had no significant effect on the harvest index of groundnut at the respective stages.

    Influence of growth stage on the association between some tropical legumes and two variant species ofGlomusin an andosol · 1995

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    GRD graft inoculation reduced dry haulm weight, and seed yield.

    Varietal Response to Groundnut Rosette Disease and the First Report of Groundnut ringspot virus in Ghana · 2015 · compared with healthy plants

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    S. rolfsii inoculation decreased pod yield in all experiments.

    Additive Effects of Meloidogyne arenaria and Sclerotinin rolfsii on Peanut. · 1996

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Inoculating peanut on new land in Alabama produced no yield response compared with the uninoculated control.

    Inoculation of Peanuts on Farmers' Fields in Alabama1 · 1983 · compared with uninoculated control

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Rhizobial inoculation did not enhance pod yield of groundnut in the inoculation experiments.

    N2 fixation of groundnut in the eastern region of South Vietnam. · 2002

    Opposite direction

212 papers more in this group

See all 221 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.