Abstract
A field experiment was carried out at Ismailia Agric. Res. Station during the summer season of 2005 to study the integrated effect of the application of different N-forms, i.e., mineral fertilizer (Ammonium sulphate) and or organic fertilizer (compost) combined with or without cyanobacterial inoculation on improving peanut productivity as well as the effect on soil organic matter content and some biological soil properties. Results revealed that generally the integration between the organic (compost) and mineral fertilizers in peanut cultivation was more beneficial than the use of either compost or mineral nitrogen fertilizer each alone. Also cyanobacteria inoculation was better in enhancing the growth and yield of peanut. However, this integration phenomena, was more pronounced when the integration included the treatment of 1/2 RN from compost + 1/2 RN from mineral fertilizer in addition to cyanobacteria inoculation. This treatment gave significantly the highest values of peanut seed and foliage yields, NPK uptake for seed and foliage, soil microbial community and soil biological activity in terms of CO2 evolution and dehydrogenase activity. The integration of organic and mineral fertilizers in combination with biofertilizers may become a promise of the eco-friendly future agriculture, especially in the newly reclaimed sandy soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Combining compost and mineral fertilizer was more beneficial for peanut cultivation than either fertilizer alone.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- integration between the organic (compost) and mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- more beneficiale0
- Direction
- more beneficiale0
- Comparator
- either compost or mineral nitrogen fertilizer each alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the integration between the organic (compost) and mineral fertilizers in peanut cultivation was more beneficial than the use of either compost or mineral nitrogen fertilizer each alone”
t0“PEANUT”
Claim · model-written summary
Cyanobacterial inoculation enhanced peanut growth and yield.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- cyanobacteria inoculatione0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- enhancinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cyanobacteria inoculation was better in enhancing the growth and yield of peanut”
t0“PEANUT”
Claim · model-written summary
Half the recommended N from compost plus half from mineral fertilizer and cyanobacteria inoculation gave the highest peanut seed and foliage yields.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- 1/2 RN from compost + 1/2 RN from mineral fertilizer in addition to cyanobacteria inoculatione0
- Outcome
- peanut seed and foliage yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1/2 RN from compost + 1/2 RN from mineral fertilizer in addition to cyanobacteria inoculation. This treatment gave significantly the highest values of peanut seed and foliage yields”
t0“PEANUT”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave the highest NPK uptake in peanut seed and foliage.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- This treatmente0
- Outcome
- NPK uptake for seed and foliagee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment gave significantly the highest values of peanut seed and foliage yields, NPK uptake for seed and foliage”
t0“PEANUT”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave the highest soil microbial community and biological activity measures.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- This treatmente0
- Outcome
- soil microbial community and soil biological activitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment gave significantly the highest values of peanut seed and foliage yields, NPK uptake for seed and foliage, soil microbial community and soil biological activity in terms of CO2 evolution and dehydrogenase activity”
t0“PEANUT”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose combining organic and mineral fertilizers with biofertilizers for newly reclaimed sandy soil.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- integration of organic and mineral fertilizers in combination with biofertilizerse0
- Qualifier
- newly reclaimed sandy soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The integration of organic and mineral fertilizers in combination with biofertilizers may become a promise of the eco-friendly future agriculture, especially in the newly reclaimed sandy soil”
t0“PEANUT”
The same questions in other papers
Cyanobacteriota · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
217 papers more in this group
See all 221 papers →fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
679 papers more in this group
See all 683 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.