Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Trunk injection with soil fertilizing increased yield per tree by 18.26%.

A claim from Studies of trunk injection fertilizing in pear trees · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trunk injection with soil fertilizing increased yield per tree by 18.26%.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
trunk injection fertilizing and soil fertilizinge1
Outcome
yield per treee0
Direction
increasede3
Value
18.26%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield per tree by 31.77% and 18.26%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–745
t0

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–52
t1

“pear trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–52
e1

“single trunk injection fertilizing,trunk injection fertilizing and soil fertilizing,soil fertilizing and foliar spray fertilizing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–231
e2

“could increase individual leaf area by 8.63 cm 2 and 6.11 cm 2,dry weight per cm 2 by 2.90 mg/cm 2 and 0.40 mg/cm 2 ;the contents of leaf total chlorophyll by 47.76% and 42.13% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–506
e3

“Individual fruit weight increased by 17.8% and 6.5%.and yield per tree by 31.77% and 18.26%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–745

Title

Studies of trunk injection fertilizing in pear trees

Yue Wang Xibei Nong-Lin Keji Daxue xuebao. Ziran kexue ban 2002

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-1698fbefd9ade587cfbcefa55ca618d07cb614142191e01a76246b387c0f3cdd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.