Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AMF plus M. incognita had the lowest galling index, 53%

A claim from Hongos micorrícicos arbusculares y Trichoderma en Capsicum annuum disminuyen el daño inducido por Meloidogyne incognita · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF plus M. incognita had the lowest galling index, 53%

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
AMF + Mie1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
galling indexe1
Direction
loweste1
Value
53%e1
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consortia of native species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and Trichoderma (TRI) strains were evaluated in a greenhouse to control the sedentary endoparasitic nematode, Meloidogyne incognita (Mi) on Capsicum annuum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–221
e1

“After 166 days, the AMF + Mi treatment resulted in the lowest galling index (53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–613

Title

Hongos micorrícicos arbusculares y Trichoderma en Capsicum annuum disminuyen el daño inducido por Meloidogyne incognita

Carolina Isabel Basto Pool; Elizabeth Herrera Parra; Jairo Cristóbal Alejo; et al. Temas Agrarios 2023. doi:10.21897/rta.v28i1.3158

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-16c09e4056cf8a52de08f7c56faa335c1624a0c958fd31154770fbfb8550d8e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · Meloidogyne incognita · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.