Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Imazaquin did not reduce resistant hybrid height, density, or grain yield.

A claim from Acetolactate Synthase-Resistant and -Susceptible Corn (Zea mays) Response to Imazethapyr, Imazaquin, Chlorimuron, and CGA-152005 · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazaquin did not reduce resistant hybrid height, density, or grain yield.

Material
resistant hybride0
Treatment
imazaquine0
Outcome
height, density, or grain yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazethapyr, imazaquin, and chlorimuron did not reduce height, density, or grain yield of the resistant hybrid, regardless of application timing or rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1238
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64

Title

Acetolactate Synthase-Resistant and -Susceptible Corn (Zea mays) Response to Imazethapyr, Imazaquin, Chlorimuron, and CGA-152005

Ronald F. Krausz; George Kapusta; Joseph L. Matthews Weed Technology 1997. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00043487

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-16ef92d9f3f92f3f74c9860fc74194f8f3c244748288673f711f74885de2e0f5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

imazaquin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.