Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation at 1.0 IW:CPE significantly increased dry-matter production and grain yield

A claim from Evaluation of water-use efficiency and soil physical properties under different sowing methods, mulch levels and irrigation schedules in wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: Irrigation schedule of 1.0 irrigation water/cumulative pan evaporation (IW: CPE)e2
Outcome: dry-matter production and grain yielde2
Direction: increasede2
Setting: Ludhiana, Punjabe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Triticum aestivum* · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“A field experiment was conducted at Ludhiana, Punjab”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52

e1
“in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–267

e2
“Irrigation schedule of 1.0 irrigation water/cumulative pan evaporation (IW: CPE) significantly increased the dry-matter production and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1175

Title

Evaluation of water-use efficiency and soil physical properties under different sowing methods, mulch levels and irrigation schedules in wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Jagroop Kaur; S. S. Mahal; A. S. Brar Indian Journal of Agronomy 2018

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Bed sowing gave significantly higher apparent water productivity than flat sowing (14.5%)
Intervention effect Bed sowing gave significantly higher root density in the 0–15 cm soil layer than flat sowing (1.7%)
Intervention effect Bed sowing gave significantly higher infiltration rate of water than flat sowing (13.4%)
Intervention effect Bed sowing gave significantly lower bulk density in the 0–15 cm soil layer than flat sowing (3.1%)
Intervention effect Bed sowing gave significantly lower soil-penetration resistance at 15 cm depth than flat sowing (18.2%)
Intervention effect Paddy straw mulch at 6 t/ha significantly increased leaf-area index, photosynthetically active radiation interception and dry-matter production over 3 t/ha and no mulch
Intervention effect Paddy straw mulch at 6 t/ha significantly increased grain yield over 3 t/ha and no mulch
Intervention effect Mulch at 6 t/ha increased water-use efficiency by 16.5 kg/ha/cm over mulch at 3 t/ha
Intervention effect Mulch at 6 t/ha increased water-use efficiency by 32.9 kg/ha/cm over no mulch
Intervention effect Mulch at 6 t/ha lowered maximum soil temperature, bulk density and soil-penetration resistance relative to no mulch
Intervention effect Irrigation at 0.6 IW:CPE significantly increased WUE and apparent water productivity relative to 0.8 and 1.0 IW:CPE

Record rev-190b42a2bb318cc312e5c97f41acbdc966e4f431d77f63a696a0b3b8249c2bd0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

negative
Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.
Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)
Opposite direction
no effect
Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.
Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water
Opposite direction
negative
Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.
Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019
Opposite direction
negative
Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.
Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022
Opposite direction
negative
Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.
Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020
Opposite direction
no effect
An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.
Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010
Opposite direction
no effect
DI water saving had no effect on wheat yield.
Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012
Opposite direction
negative
Limited irrigation yielded 99% of full irrigation for winter wheat.
Cropping Systems for Stretching Limited Irrigation Supplies · 1993 · compared with fully irrigated
Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results