Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cow dung extract 5% alone had 34.9% shoot borer infestation.

A claim from ECO-FRIENDLY APPROACHES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SHOOT AND FRUIT BORER (EARIAS VITTELLA FAB.) IN OKRA · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow dung extract 5% alone had 34.9% shoot borer infestation.

Treatment
cow dung extract 5% alonee0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae2pest
Outcome
shoot borer infestatione1
Direction
followed bye0
Value
34.9e0
Comparator
cow dung extract 5% + cow urine 5%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum infestation 35.6% was observed in cow dung extract 5% + cow urine 5% plot followed by cow dung extract 5% alone (34.9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–484
e1

“shoot borer infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–248
e2

“Earias vittella (Fab.) on okra c.v. Kashi Pragati (VRO -6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–168

Title

ECO-FRIENDLY APPROACHES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SHOOT AND FRUIT BORER (EARIAS VITTELLA FAB.) IN OKRA

H.K. Gautam; N.N. Singh; A.B. Rai Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 2013

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-1a16dac106c00a1cdf8b0250a7b65318f975c3ccd7f7d4cd440afa3aef8e60eb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

botanical · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.