Claim · model-written summary
16,17-dihydro GA 5 stimulated development in up to 80% of treated buds.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae2 - Treatment
- 16,17-dihydro GA 5e1
- Outcome
- floral bud developmente0
- Direction
- stimulatede0
- Value
- up to 80%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It stimulated floral bud development in up to 80% of the treated buds.”
e1“was 16,17-dihydro GA 5”
e2“peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.)”
Title
Herminda Reinoso; Virginia Luna; Carlos Dauría; et al. Canadian Journal of Botany 2002. doi:10.1139/b02-051
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Late GA 3 hastened floral bud development and anthesis.
- Intervention effect Early GA 3 had no effect or delayed floral bud development.
- Intervention effect 2,2-dimethyl GA 4 promoted bud development on cuttings across application dates.
- Intervention effect 2,2-dimethyl GA 4 caused substantial bud abscission.
- Intervention effect Remaining buds after 2,2-dimethyl GA 4 had necrotic gynoecia and androecial alterations.
- Intervention effect Trinexapac-ethyl promoted bud development less effectively than GA 1.
- Intervention effect Trinexapac-ethyl-treated buds showed morphological alterations and gynoecium necrosis.
- Intervention effect 16,17-dihydro GA 5 was the most consistent treatment for bud development and earlier anthesis.
- Intervention effect The promotive effect of 16,17-dihydro GA 5 persisted to anthesis in field trees and cuttings.