Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium nitrate and ammonium polyphosphate were comparable carriers when zinc sulfate was the source.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0 - Treatment
- when ZnSO 4 was the sourcee3
- Outcome
- comparable carrierse3
- Direction
- comparablee3
- Comparator
- APPe3
- Setting
- Nolichucky sandy clay loame0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two successive crops of corn ( Zea mays ) grown on Nolichucky sandy clay loam (pH 7.3)”
e3“Ammonium nitrate and APP were comparable carriers when ZnSO 4 was the source, but APP was superior to AN when ZnO was used”
Title
Zinc Availability for Corn as Related to Source and Concentration in Macronutrient Carriers
P. M. Giordano; J. J. Mortvedt Soil Science Society of America Journal 1966. doi:10.2136/sssaj1966.03615995003000050032x
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Zinc oxide and zinc sulfate mixed with the soil were more effective than when incorporated with a macronutrient carrier.
- Intervention effect Zinc oxide and zinc sulfate were markedly superior to zinc sulfide.
- Intervention effect Ammonium polyphosphate was superior to ammonium nitrate as a carrier when zinc oxide was used.
- Association A higher zinc concentration in the CSP granules gave a poorer response to that carrier.
- Association Forage yields and zinc uptake varied inversely with zinc concentration in all carriers.