Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In-season split nitrogen did not significantly change area-scaled nitrous oxide emissions in any year versus pre-season nitrogen.

A claim from In-season split nitrogen application and cover cropping effects on nitrous oxide emissions in rainfed maize · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In-season split nitrogen did not significantly change area-scaled nitrous oxide emissions in any year versus pre-season nitrogen.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
in-season split N applicatione0
Outcome
area- or yield-scaled N2O emissionse0
Comparator
pre-seasone0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shifting from pre-season to in-season split N application did not significantly affect area- or yield-scaled N2O emissions in any year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1117
t0

“rainfed maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107

Title

In-season split nitrogen application and cover cropping effects on nitrous oxide emissions in rainfed maize

Giovani Preza-Fontes; Laura E. Christianson; Kristin Greer; et al. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 2021. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2021.107813

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-1e84c2ebdce446af41e5107a070bd33f16f791c4f86ec5936df4f6eab732ae41 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2,176 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.