Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biofertilizer improved number of onion leaves per plant.

A claim from Effect of biofertilizer and gibberellic acid on growth and yield of onion. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer improved number of onion leaves per plant.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
biofertilier (12 kg/ha Azospirillum + PSB and 20 kg /ha VAM)e0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
number of leaves per plante0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of biofertilier (12 kg/ha Azospirillum + PSB and 20 kg /ha VAM) significantly improved growth contributing characters such as number of leaves per plant days for bulb sprouting and seed harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–842
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73

Title

Effect of biofertilizer and gibberellic acid on growth and yield of onion.

Hemant Sanjay Waghmode; R. S. Patil; B. S. Pandure THE ASIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE 2010

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-1e8df950a15dafdeb841c670e6e258f417919198afa6273f7857e09636cc8810 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.