Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during the winter season of two consecutive years 2006-07 and 2007-08 to study the effect of six combinations of bio-fertilizers and two chemical fertilizers on onion cv. Sukhsagar. The treatments were Azotobacter+PSB, Azotobacter+VAM, Azotobacter+Azospirillum, Azospirillum+PSB, Azospirrilum+VAM, PSB+VAM, NPK 100%, NPK 50% and Control. The height of the plant was maximum (43.46cm) with the application of Azotobacter+VAM. No. of leaves, no. of inflorescence / plot and bulb diameter were maximum of Azotobacter+Azospirillum. Azotobacter+Azospirillum and NPK 100% gave maximum length of bulbs(6.03cm). The maximum number of scale per bulb (9.81) was counted from NPK 50%.The plants raised under NPK 100% produced the maximum bulb weight 67.45g. TSS % was found maximum (12.29%) from NPK 100% but the highest reducing sugar (1.420%) and starch percentage (6.27%) were noted from NPK 50%. The total loss of weight (%) upto 60 days, was found minimum (11.5%) from Azotobacter+PSB followed by Azotobacter+Azospirillum (14.32%). It is therefore, concluded that Azotobacter+Azospirillum combination is the bestfor onion as compared to others so far as the sustainability in production and environmental consideration are concerned.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter plus VAM gave the maximum onion plant height of 43.46cm.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- Azotobacter+VAMe0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- height of the plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 43.46cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The height of the plant was maximum (43.46cm) with the application of Azotobacter+VAM”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter plus Azospirillum maximized leaf number, inflorescences per plot and bulb diameter.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepae1
- Treatment
- Azotobacter+Azospirillume0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Azospirillum
Azospirillume0symbiont - Outcome
- No. of leaves, no. of inflorescence / plot and bulb diametere0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No. of leaves, no. of inflorescence / plot and bulb diameter were maximum of Azotobacter+Azospirillum”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter plus Azospirillum yielded maximum bulb length of 6.03cm.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepae1
- Treatment
- Azotobacter+Azospirillume0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- length of bulbse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 6.03cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Azotobacter+Azospirillum and NPK 100% gave maximum length of bulbs(6.03cm)”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK 100% yielded maximum bulb length of 6.03cm.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Azotobacter+Azospirillum and NPK 100% gave maximum length of bulbs(6.03cm)”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK 50% gave the maximum number of scales per bulb, 9.81.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepae1
- Treatment
- NPK 50%e0
- Outcome
- number of scale per bulbe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 9.81e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum number of scale per bulb (9.81) was counted from NPK 50%”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK 100% gave maximum bulb weight of 67.45g.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The plants raised under NPK 100% produced the maximum bulb weight 67.45g”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK 100% gave maximum TSS of 12.29%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TSS % was found maximum (12.29%) from NPK 100%”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK 50% gave the highest reducing sugar, 1.420%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest reducing sugar (1.420%) and starch percentage (6.27%) were noted from NPK 50%”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK 50% gave the highest starch percentage, 6.27%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest reducing sugar (1.420%) and starch percentage (6.27%) were noted from NPK 50%”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter plus PSB minimized weight loss through 60 days at 11.5%.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepae1
- Treatment
- Azotobacter+PSBe0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- total loss of weight (%)e0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 11.5%e0
- Qualifier
- upto 60 dayse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The total loss of weight (%) upto 60 days, was found minimum (11.5%) from Azotobacter+PSB followed by Azotobacter+Azospirillum (14.32%)”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter plus Azospirillum had 14.32% weight loss, following Azotobacter plus PSB.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepae1
- Treatment
- Azotobacter+Azospirillume0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- total loss of weight (%)e0
- Direction
- followede0
- Value
- 14.32%e0
- Qualifier
- upto 60 dayse0
- Comparator
- Azotobacter+PSBe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The total loss of weight (%) upto 60 days, was found minimum (11.5%) from Azotobacter+PSB followed by Azotobacter+Azospirillum (14.32%)”
e1“on onion cv. Sukhsagar”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend Azotobacter plus Azospirillum for sustainable onion production and environmental considerations.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepae0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- Azotobacter+Azospirillum combination is the bestfor onione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Azotobacter+Azospirillum combination is the bestfor onion as compared to others so far as the sustainability in production and environmental consideration are concerned”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Azotobacter · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Azospirillum · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree
23 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
526 papers more in this group
See all 530 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.