Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dipping in natural-product antibrowning solutions prevented browning of fresh-cut apple slices for up to 5 weeks at 5 degrees C.

A claim from Extending Storage Life of Fresh-Cut Apples Using Natural Products and Their Derivatives · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping in natural-product antibrowning solutions prevented browning of fresh-cut apple slices for up to 5 weeks at 5 degrees C.

Material
Red Deliciouse1
Treatment
dipping solutions of compounds derived from natural productse0
Outcome
browninge0
Direction
prevente0
Value
up to 5 weekse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fresh-Cut Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–42
e0

“Treatments were devised to prevent browning for up to 5 weeks at 5 degrees C with no apparent microbial growth using dipping solutions of compounds derived from natural products consisting of 4-hexylresorcinol, isoascorbic acid, a sulfur-containing amino acid (N-acetylcysteine), and calcium propionate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–753
e1

“browning of Red Delicious apple slices stored at 5 and 10 degrees C under normal atmospheric conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–449

Title

Extending Storage Life of Fresh-Cut Apples Using Natural Products and Their Derivatives

J. George Buta; Harold E. Moline; David W. Spaulding; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1998. doi:10.1021/jf980712x

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-1f4e28d3aa7eafb2f1681158594761670371917f11dc809d3527dc3f1dd46025 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 80 positive, 27 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this claim · 26 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.