Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two irrigations gave significantly superior plant height (75.85) to the control and were at par with three irrigations.

A claim from Effect of varying levels of silicon and restricted irrigation on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Bhal condition of Gujarat · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations gave significantly superior plant height (75.85) to the control and were at par with three irrigations.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two irrigation (I3)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
75.85e0
Qualifier
being at par with three irrigation (I4)e0
Comparator
control (I1)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results from the experiment indicate that significantly superior data were recorded with two irrigation (I3) in case of plant height (75.85), effective tillers per plant (6.18), ear length (cm) (8.71), grains per ear (35.42), test weight (g) (46.29) and grain yield (3360 kg ha-1) over control (I1) and being at par with three irrigation (I4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–577
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109

Title

Effect of varying levels of silicon and restricted irrigation on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Bhal condition of Gujarat

Ram Niwas Choudhary; Kinjal J Suthar; Sanjay D Doba; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2021. doi:10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1r.11398

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-1f52a8305f006b29f7bd6b8153e9b549a1ff61b8e034f031b79185a916a0ec59 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.