Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar riboflavin application increased sorghum grain yield and its components.

A claim from Response of some Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor, L. Moench) Cultivars to Foliar Spraying of Riboflavin Growth, Grain Yield and Proline Content · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar riboflavin application increased sorghum grain yield and its components.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Foliar application of riboflavinee3
Outcome
grain yield and its componentse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor, L. Moench) Cultivars to Foliar Spraying of Riboflavin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–96
e3

“Foliar application of riboflavine improved most of vegetative growth traits including plant height and leaf area, while it reduced the proline content in plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1003
e4

“This in turn increased the grain yield and its components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1118

Title

Response of some Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor, L. Moench) Cultivars to Foliar Spraying of Riboflavin Growth, Grain Yield and Proline Content

N. Abood; Z. Abdulhameed Journal of Plant Production 2017. doi:10.21608/jpp.2017.41117

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-2013b63da1ea7f294bb4dce01cab3f2965e72aa700eaed30de496d2a1399a0af · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.