Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing irrigations from one to four gave a yield increase of 2.23% to 7.95% across sowing dates.

A claim from Modelling Adaptation Strategies to Mitigate Climate Change Impact in Wheat underMid-Hill Regions of Himachal Pradesh · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigations from one to four gave a yield increase of 2.23% to 7.95% across sowing dates.

Material
various sowing datese2
Treatment
increasing the frequency of irrigations from one to foure1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
2.23% to 7.95%e2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four wheat varieties (viz., HS-490, VL-829, VL-892 and VL-907)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–251
e1

“increasing the frequency of irrigations from one to four nullified the impact of climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–964
e2

“led to a yield increase ranging from 2.23% to 7.95% for various sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1045

Title

Modelling Adaptation Strategies to Mitigate Climate Change Impact in Wheat underMid-Hill Regions of Himachal Pradesh

Ranu Pathania; Saurav Sharma; Rajendra Prasad; et al. Journal of Mountain Research 2025. doi:10.51220/jmr.v20-i1.50

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-218ac535b34fc015bfdbe0623e96d13099561c69d60f38bcb93f3b1057d04308 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.