Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Betulaefolia rootstock gave better pear vegetative growth than Communis.

A claim from PHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES ON FERTILIZATION OF LECONT CV. PEAR TRANSPLANTS 1-Some vegetative growth parameters · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Betulaefolia rootstock gave better pear vegetative growth than Communis.

Material
Betulaefoliae0
Treatment
Betulaefolia rootstocke0
Outcome
vegetative growth measurementse1
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Communis rootstocke0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Betulaefolia rootstock was better than Communis rootstock in this respect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–366
e1

“some vegetative growth measurements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–265
t0

“LECONT CV. PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57

Title

PHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES ON FERTILIZATION OF LECONT CV. PEAR TRANSPLANTS 1-Some vegetative growth parameters

A And Bakry; E Abd-Ella; S Mervate; et al. Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor 2021. doi:10.21608/assjm.2021.207317

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-22cb6af9d4f73ca0a49835d67be46e6b087e6f644ca58bc578e627f556d9b14c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

grafting · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.