Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Optimal fertilization under controlled irrigation increased stem diameter by 9.4%~17.5% at 40 days after heading compared with FFP.

A claim from EFFECTS OF WATRE AND FERTILIZER OPTIMIZATION ON LODGING RESISTANCE OF RICE IN COLD AREA OF NORTHEASTERN CHINA · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal fertilization under controlled irrigation increased stem diameter by 9.4%~17.5% at 40 days after heading compared with FFP.

Treatment
optimal fertilization practice under controlled irrigatione2
Outcome
stem diametere3
Direction
increasede3
Value
9.4%~17.5%e3
Comparator
FFPe3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“lodging resistance of rice with different densities(25 and 30 per square meter) in cold area of northeastern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–227
e2

“compared to farmers fertilization practice under regular irrigation(FFP-25,FFP-30),the yield of optimal fertilization practice under controlled irrigation(OPT-25,OPT-30) were increased by 8.5%~9.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–448
e3

“At 40 days after heading,stem diameter and wall thickness were increased by 9.4%~17.5%(P0.05) and 12.7%~21.2%(P0.05) compared to FFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–588

Title

EFFECTS OF WATRE AND FERTILIZER OPTIMIZATION ON LODGING RESISTANCE OF RICE IN COLD AREA OF NORTHEASTERN CHINA

Wenbo Song Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences 2012

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-25dce8dea75cfd9395ca3977a78183851d7ce6e16cee64188924d1636fc47a00 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this claim · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this claim · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

750 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.