Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Maize yield under NT was lower than CT, by 19%.

A claim from Effects of reduced tillage and prolonged cover cropping in maize on soil quality and yield · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield under NT was lower than CT, by 19%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
maize yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
19 %e1
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize yields were lower in NT, CT-prolonged and ST-prolonged compared to CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2032
e1

“no-till reduced it by 19 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3033–3059

Title

Effects of reduced tillage and prolonged cover cropping in maize on soil quality and yield

Joost Sleiderink; Joachim G.C. Deru; Rommie van der Weide; et al. Soil and Tillage Research 2024. doi:10.1016/j.still.2024.106196

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-262ea613102c50861c1b54acec31dd793347c81387910178008b35a9389d5b25 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this claim · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.