Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Compared with conventional tillage, deep straw incorporation increased maize glutamine synthetase (GS) activity by 12.47%.

A claim from Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Maize Yield Enhancement by Straw Return in the Thin-Layer Mollisol Region of the Songnen Plain · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with conventional tillage, deep straw incorporation increased maize glutamine synthetase (GS) activity by 12.47%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
deep straw incorporation (DF)e2
Outcome
glutamine synthetase (GS)e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
12.47%e0
Qualifier
activitiese0
Comparator
CTe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41
e0

“increasing the chlorophyll SPAD value by 16.05%, net photosynthetic rate (Pn) by 11.28%, and the activities of RuBP, PEP, nitrate reductase (NR), and glutamine synthetase (GS) by 10.59%, 24.36%, 29.94%, and 12.47%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1398
e1

“Compared with CT, DF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–716
e2

“deep straw incorporation (DF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–654

Title

Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Maize Yield Enhancement by Straw Return in the Thin-Layer Mollisol Region of the Songnen Plain

Chenglong Guan; Tai Ma; Ming Miao; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants14213331

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-276291d06fefe830e66caa2881e0224196102740b51db8ee17f95ebe598b85a8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

organic · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.