Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals depressed spikes per area, kernels per spike and thousand-kernel weight, especially early in growth.

A claim from EVALUATION OF SOME NEW BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND N-FERTILIZATION LEVELS IN SANDY SOILS. · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals depressed spikes per area, kernels per spike and thousand-kernel weight, especially early in growth.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elongating the irrigation intervalse0
Outcome
number of spikes/m², number of kernels/spike and 1000-kernel weighte0
Direction
depressede0
Qualifier
reductions being more at the first stagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of spikes/m², number of kernels/spike and 1000-kernel weight were also depressed by elongating the irrigation intervals with reductions being more at the first stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1280
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193

Title

EVALUATION OF SOME NEW BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND N-FERTILIZATION LEVELS IN SANDY SOILS.

Iman Sadek, Journal of Plant Production 2000. doi:10.21608/jpp.2000.260250

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-276acf07e8af850c23e0d6aff93d3cfb79f31c932a3a0b52a7b5099cf9b16fad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

191 papers in the same direction as this claim · 797 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.