Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seven-day irrigation throughout the season gave the highest grain yield across genotypes.

A claim from EVALUATION OF SOME NEW BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND N-FERTILIZATION LEVELS IN SANDY SOILS. · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven-day irrigation throughout the season gave the highest grain yield across genotypes.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
irrigation every seven days through the seasone0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation every seven days through the season resulted in the highest grain yield from all tested genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–810
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193

Title

EVALUATION OF SOME NEW BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND N-FERTILIZATION LEVELS IN SANDY SOILS.

Iman Sadek, Journal of Plant Production 2000. doi:10.21608/jpp.2000.260250

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-9a24027371cb40c4231c3b152aff6a2bacd8cd1293057e8066a1346968c1b459 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this claim · 79 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

145 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.