Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Compared with fenoxaprop alone, 4 g L-1 urea with 1.33 ml L-1 fenoxaprop significantly increased potato tuber yield by 11%.

A claim from Fenoxaprop combined with urea improves photosynthesis, weed control, and yield of potato · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with fenoxaprop alone, 4 g L-1 urea with 1.33 ml L-1 fenoxaprop significantly increased potato tuber yield by 11%.

Treatment
the combination of 4‐g L −1 urea and 1.33‐ml L −1 fenoxaprope4
Outcome
potato tuber yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
11%e4
Comparator
fenoxaprop treatment alonee4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88
e4

“Compared with fenoxaprop treatment alone, the combination of 4‐g L −1 urea and 1.33‐ml L −1 fenoxaprop significantly increased the Pn of potato plants, weed control efficacy, and potato tuber yield by 36.12, 11.35, and 11%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1316

Title

Fenoxaprop combined with urea improves photosynthesis, weed control, and yield of potato

Jinhua Zhang; Wanming Yang; Zhefeng Zhou Crop Science 2020. doi:10.1002/csc2.20165

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-287e4d9ec0ecf9cddd6ec0aab4f4c81862fb40332d674b22522353af7e132937 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.