Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same mixed nutrient approach maximized macronutrient uptake by cucumber.

A claim from Response of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources on Soil Nutrient Status of Cucumber Production under Protected Cultivation · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same mixed nutrient approach maximized macronutrient uptake by cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
50% organic management through innovative approaches and 50 % RDF through organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
uptake of macro nutrientse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% organic management through innovative approaches and 50 % RDF through organic fertilizers resulted in maximum production of cucumber and maximum uptake of macro nutrients by the cucumber plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–641

Title

Response of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources on Soil Nutrient Status of Cucumber Production under Protected Cultivation

K. S. Rajawat; K. D. Ameta; Jitendra Kumar Tak; et al. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology 2021. doi:10.9734/cjast/2021/v40i4431622

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-28da55c8232192c8e98af69f55b1417772c3e3a25d6fc1203cc80192b43a7f32 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

cultivation system · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

94 papers: 78 positive, 16 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.