Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc foliar treatment at two concentrations increased sugar beet root growth parameters.

A claim from Micronutrients through foliar application enhance growth, yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgarisL.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc foliar treatment at two concentrations increased sugar beet root growth parameters.

Treatment
zinc (Zn) at rates of 50 and 100 mg L−1e1
Outcome
root diameter, root length, root fresh weight, and root dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn, B, and Mo foliar treatments at the two concentrations increased the growth parameters of roots, that is, root diameter, root length, root fresh weight, and root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–784
e1

“zinc (Zn) at rates of 50 and 100 mg L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–379
e2

“sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–583

Title

Micronutrients through foliar application enhance growth, yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgarisL.)

R. M. Y. Zewail; I. S. El-Gmal; Botir Khaitov; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1771580

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2a976a445c835e76d57dea7002b756ab6efcd4cd18e4e83a7cd5b362b1c2f271 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.