Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irradiated grains had better diastase digestibility than unirradiated grains.

A claim from $gamma$-RAY PROCESSING OF RICE. (II.) THE EFFECT OF $gamma$-IRRADIATION ON FOOD CHEMICAL QUALITY OF RICE · 1960

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated grains had better diastase digestibility than unirradiated grains.

Treatment
irradiated grainse0
Outcome
Digestibilitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
unirradiated grainse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Digestibility studies using diastase showed that irradiated grains were better than the unirradiated grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–464
t0

“PROCESSING OF RICE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31

Title

$gamma$-RAY PROCESSING OF RICE. (II.) THE EFFECT OF $gamma$-IRRADIATION ON FOOD CHEMICAL QUALITY OF RICE

Akemi Nishimura; K. Takaoka OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1960

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-2b8bdd3d54ebb59c9a12582e93bd3e4be8d489760886c5efa63dffb40ccd9aa9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

radiation · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.