Claim · model-written summary
Rough rice resisted compression more than dehulled rice.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Material
- Rough ricee0
- Outcome
- resistance to compressione0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- dehulled ricee0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rough rice presented more resistance to compression compared to dehulled rice”
Title
Mechanical properties of rough and dehulled rice during drying
Osvaldo Resende; Paulo César Corrêa; Gabriel Oliveira; et al. International Journal of Food Studies 2013. doi:10.7455/ijfs/2.2.2013.a3
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Association Dehulled rice rupture force rose from 37.2 to 70.6 N as moisture declined.
- Association Rough rice rupture force rose from 48.0 to 79.5 N as moisture declined.
- Observation Average compression force ranged from 131 to 171 N for dehulled rice.
- Observation Average compression force ranged from 203 to 283 N for rough rice.
- Observation Dehulled rice proportional deformity modulus ranged from 5.5 x 109 to 7.4 x 109 Pa.
- Observation Rough rice proportional deformity modulus ranged from 9.5 x 109 to 12.3 x 109 Pa.