Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar Fe-NPs and/or Fe-chelated (EDTA) at 0.1% enhanced vegetative growth, flower set and tree nutritional status of Washington navel orange trees.

A claim from Foliar Application of Nano, Chelated, and Conventional Iron Forms Enhanced Growth, Nutritional Status, Fruiting Aspects, and Fruit Quality of Washington Navel Orange Trees (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe-NPs and/or Fe-chelated (EDTA) at 0.1% enhanced vegetative growth, flower set and tree nutritional status of Washington navel orange trees.

Taxon
Washington navel orange treese2
Treatment
Fe-NPs (nanoform) and/or Fe-chelated (EDTA) at 0.1%e3
Outcome
vegetative growth, flower set, tree nutritional statuse3
Direction
enhancinge3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e3

“the spraying of the Washington navel orange trees grown under similar environmental conditions and horticulture practices adopted in the current experiment with Fe-NPs (nanoform) and/or Fe-chelated (EDTA) at 0.1% is a beneficial application for enhancing vegetative growth, flower set, tree nutritional status, and fruit production and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1185
e2

“This research was implemented on Washington navel orange trees (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–453

Title

Foliar Application of Nano, Chelated, and Conventional Iron Forms Enhanced Growth, Nutritional Status, Fruiting Aspects, and Fruit Quality of Washington Navel Orange Trees (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck)

Sherif F. El-Gioushy; Zheli Ding; Asmaa M. E. Bahloul; et al. Plants 2021. doi:10.3390/plants10122577

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-2bb4f7143da224289da5c6c0199171f0f9db9bccf5ae575e93db4103ddf8c942 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

iron atom · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.