Abstract
Abstract The factorial experiment was conducted in the Department of Horticulture and Landscape Gardening Design, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad, Iraq through the growing season 2020 to investigate the vegetative growth response of navel orange seedlings grafted on the Citrus stocks to the spraying with balanced Nano-NPK (20-20-20) at four concentrations of (0,1,2 and 3) g. l -1 and yeast extract the following concentrations (0, 1.5, 3 and 4.5) g.l -1 . The results in the two seasons showed a superiority effects of the interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extract which it reached to the characters plant high, stem diameter, leaves number, leaf area, leaves area, branches number and chlorophyll (26.253cm.seedling -1 ,1.6867 mm.seedling -1 ,42.80leaf.seedling -1 ,33.267cm2.leaf -1 ,46.25cm 2 .seedling -1 ,8.8067 branch.seedling -1 and 273.93 mg.100g -1 fw) in the first season and (27.233cm.seedling -1 ,2.41 mm.seedling -1 , 54.67leaf.seedling -1 ,34.400 cm2.leaf 1- ,53.40 cm 2 .seedling - 8.8073 branch.seedling -1 and 268.0mg.100 g -1 fw) in the second season for the studied characters respectively. Also, the interaction treatment (N3Y3) at the highest level of both of Nano-NPK and yeast extract showed the best results in the percentage of dry matter, N, P and K leaves content while the control treatment was the least for all the studied characters.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction treatments at the highest concentrations increased plant height, to 26.253 cm per seedling in the first season and 27.233 cm in the second.
- Taxon
- C. sinensis
Citrus sinensist0 - Treatment
- interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extracte1
- Outcome
- plant highe1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 26.253cm.seedling -1e1
- Setting
- University of Baghdad, Iraqe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”
e0“University of Baghdad, Iraq through the growing season 2020”
e1“showed a superiority effects of the interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extract which it reached to the characters plant high, stem diameter, leaves number, leaf area, leaves area, branches number and chlorophyll (26.253cm.seedling -1 ,1.6867 mm.seedling -1 ,42.80leaf.seedling -1 ,33.267cm2.leaf -1 ,46.25cm 2 .seedling -1 ,8.8067 branch.seedling -1 and 273.93 mg.100g -1 fw) in the first season and (27.233cm.seedling -1 ,2.41 mm.seedling -1 , 54.67leaf.seedling -1 ,34.400 cm2.leaf 1- ,53.40 cm 2 .seedling - 8.8073 branch.seedling -1 and 268.0mg.100 g -1 fw) in the second season for the studied characters respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction treatments at the highest concentrations increased stem diameter, to 1.6867 mm per seedling in the first season and 2.41 mm in the second.
- Taxon
- C. sinensisCitrus sinensist0
- Treatment
- interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extracte1
- Outcome
- stem diametere1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 1.6867 mm.seedling -1e1
- Setting
- University of Baghdad, Iraqe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”
e0“University of Baghdad, Iraq through the growing season 2020”
e1“showed a superiority effects of the interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extract which it reached to the characters plant high, stem diameter, leaves number, leaf area, leaves area, branches number and chlorophyll (26.253cm.seedling -1 ,1.6867 mm.seedling -1 ,42.80leaf.seedling -1 ,33.267cm2.leaf -1 ,46.25cm 2 .seedling -1 ,8.8067 branch.seedling -1 and 273.93 mg.100g -1 fw) in the first season and (27.233cm.seedling -1 ,2.41 mm.seedling -1 , 54.67leaf.seedling -1 ,34.400 cm2.leaf 1- ,53.40 cm 2 .seedling - 8.8073 branch.seedling -1 and 268.0mg.100 g -1 fw) in the second season for the studied characters respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction treatments at the highest concentrations increased leaves number, to 42.80 per seedling in the first season and 54.67 in the second.
- Taxon
- C. sinensisCitrus sinensist0
- Treatment
- interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extracte1
- Outcome
- leaves numbere1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 42.80leaf.seedling -1e1
- Setting
- University of Baghdad, Iraqe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”
e0“University of Baghdad, Iraq through the growing season 2020”
e1“showed a superiority effects of the interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extract which it reached to the characters plant high, stem diameter, leaves number, leaf area, leaves area, branches number and chlorophyll (26.253cm.seedling -1 ,1.6867 mm.seedling -1 ,42.80leaf.seedling -1 ,33.267cm2.leaf -1 ,46.25cm 2 .seedling -1 ,8.8067 branch.seedling -1 and 273.93 mg.100g -1 fw) in the first season and (27.233cm.seedling -1 ,2.41 mm.seedling -1 , 54.67leaf.seedling -1 ,34.400 cm2.leaf 1- ,53.40 cm 2 .seedling - 8.8073 branch.seedling -1 and 268.0mg.100 g -1 fw) in the second season for the studied characters respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction treatments at the highest concentrations increased leaf area, to 33.267 cm2 per leaf in the first season and 34.400 cm2 in the second.
- Taxon
- C. sinensisCitrus sinensist0
- Treatment
- interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extracte1
- Outcome
- leaf areae1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 33.267cm2.leaf -1e1
- Setting
- University of Baghdad, Iraqe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”
e0“University of Baghdad, Iraq through the growing season 2020”
e1“showed a superiority effects of the interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extract which it reached to the characters plant high, stem diameter, leaves number, leaf area, leaves area, branches number and chlorophyll (26.253cm.seedling -1 ,1.6867 mm.seedling -1 ,42.80leaf.seedling -1 ,33.267cm2.leaf -1 ,46.25cm 2 .seedling -1 ,8.8067 branch.seedling -1 and 273.93 mg.100g -1 fw) in the first season and (27.233cm.seedling -1 ,2.41 mm.seedling -1 , 54.67leaf.seedling -1 ,34.400 cm2.leaf 1- ,53.40 cm 2 .seedling - 8.8073 branch.seedling -1 and 268.0mg.100 g -1 fw) in the second season for the studied characters respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction treatments at the highest concentrations increased leaves area, to 46.25 cm2 per seedling in the first season and 53.40 cm2 in the second.
- Taxon
- C. sinensisCitrus sinensist0
- Treatment
- interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extracte1
- Outcome
- leaves areae1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 46.25cm 2 .seedling -1e1
- Setting
- University of Baghdad, Iraqe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”
e0“University of Baghdad, Iraq through the growing season 2020”
e1“showed a superiority effects of the interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extract which it reached to the characters plant high, stem diameter, leaves number, leaf area, leaves area, branches number and chlorophyll (26.253cm.seedling -1 ,1.6867 mm.seedling -1 ,42.80leaf.seedling -1 ,33.267cm2.leaf -1 ,46.25cm 2 .seedling -1 ,8.8067 branch.seedling -1 and 273.93 mg.100g -1 fw) in the first season and (27.233cm.seedling -1 ,2.41 mm.seedling -1 , 54.67leaf.seedling -1 ,34.400 cm2.leaf 1- ,53.40 cm 2 .seedling - 8.8073 branch.seedling -1 and 268.0mg.100 g -1 fw) in the second season for the studied characters respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction treatments at the highest concentrations increased branches number, to 8.8067 per seedling in the first season and 8.8073 in the second.
- Taxon
- C. sinensisCitrus sinensist0
- Treatment
- interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extracte1
- Outcome
- branches numbere1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 8.8067 branch.seedling -1e1
- Setting
- University of Baghdad, Iraqe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”
e0“University of Baghdad, Iraq through the growing season 2020”
e1“showed a superiority effects of the interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extract which it reached to the characters plant high, stem diameter, leaves number, leaf area, leaves area, branches number and chlorophyll (26.253cm.seedling -1 ,1.6867 mm.seedling -1 ,42.80leaf.seedling -1 ,33.267cm2.leaf -1 ,46.25cm 2 .seedling -1 ,8.8067 branch.seedling -1 and 273.93 mg.100g -1 fw) in the first season and (27.233cm.seedling -1 ,2.41 mm.seedling -1 , 54.67leaf.seedling -1 ,34.400 cm2.leaf 1- ,53.40 cm 2 .seedling - 8.8073 branch.seedling -1 and 268.0mg.100 g -1 fw) in the second season for the studied characters respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction treatments at the highest concentrations increased chlorophyll, to 273.93 mg per 100 g fresh weight in the first season and 268.0 in the second.
- Taxon
- C. sinensisCitrus sinensist0
- Treatment
- interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extracte1
- Outcome
- chlorophylle1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 273.93 mg.100g -1 fwe1
- Setting
- University of Baghdad, Iraqe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”
e0“University of Baghdad, Iraq through the growing season 2020”
e1“showed a superiority effects of the interaction treatments at the highest concentrations of both of Nano-Fertilizer and yeast extract which it reached to the characters plant high, stem diameter, leaves number, leaf area, leaves area, branches number and chlorophyll (26.253cm.seedling -1 ,1.6867 mm.seedling -1 ,42.80leaf.seedling -1 ,33.267cm2.leaf -1 ,46.25cm 2 .seedling -1 ,8.8067 branch.seedling -1 and 273.93 mg.100g -1 fw) in the first season and (27.233cm.seedling -1 ,2.41 mm.seedling -1 , 54.67leaf.seedling -1 ,34.400 cm2.leaf 1- ,53.40 cm 2 .seedling - 8.8073 branch.seedling -1 and 268.0mg.100 g -1 fw) in the second season for the studied characters respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The Nano-NPK and yeast extract interaction gave the best results in percentage of dry matter, N and P of leaves compared with the control.
- Taxon
- C. sinensisCitrus sinensist0
- Treatment
- Nano-NPK and yeast extracte2
- Outcome
- percentage of dry matter, N, Pe2
- Direction
- best resultse2
- Comparator
- control treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”
e2“the interaction treatment (N3Y3) at the highest level of both of Nano-NPK and yeast extract showed the best results in the percentage of dry matter, N, P and K leaves content while the control treatment was the least for all the studied characters”
Claim · model-written summary
The Nano-NPK and yeast extract interaction gave the best results in leaf K content compared with the control.
- Taxon
- C. sinensisCitrus sinensist0
- Treatment
- Nano-NPK and yeast extracte2
- Outcome
- K leaves contente2
- Direction
- best resultse2
- Comparator
- control treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”
e2“the interaction treatment (N3Y3) at the highest level of both of Nano-NPK and yeast extract showed the best results in the percentage of dry matter, N, P and K leaves content while the control treatment was the least for all the studied characters”
Claim · model-written summary
The control treatment had the least value for all the studied characters.
- Taxon
- C. sinensisCitrus sinensist0
- Outcome
- all the studied characterse2
- Direction
- leaste2
- Qualifier
- control treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”
e2“the interaction treatment (N3Y3) at the highest level of both of Nano-NPK and yeast extract showed the best results in the percentage of dry matter, N, P and K leaves content while the control treatment was the least for all the studied characters”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · molecular: metabolites · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
botanical · physiology: pigments · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nanoparticle · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →botanical · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.