Paper · 2017 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

The use of orange peel essential oil microemulsion and nanoemulsion in pectin‐based coating to extend the shelf life of fresh‐cut orange

Mohsen Radi; Sara Akhavan‐Darabi; Hamid‐Reza Akhavan; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
120
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of pectin-based edible coatings containing orange peel essential oil (OPEO) at 0.5 and 1.0% concentrations on quality parameters of orange slices stored at 4 °C for 17 days. The variations of pH and titratable acidity in coated samples containing microemulsion and nanoemulsion were significantly higher than the controls and pectin-coated slices. The highest and lowest increases of the total soluble solids were observed in controls and 1% OPEO nanoemulsion samples, respectively. The weight and ascorbic acid losses of all coated samples were significantly lower than the controls. Higher antibacterial and antifungal effects were observed in the nanoemulsion-coated samples. In sensory evaluation, no significant differences were observed in the samples coated with microemulsion and nanoemulsion. The results showed that the nanoemulsion-based edible coatings containing OPEO can extend the shelf life of orange slices without any undesirable impacts on sensory attributes. Practical applications It is recommended to use edible coatings incorporated with essential oils to overcome the concerns of minimally processed fruit. Microemulsion and nanoemulsion of orange peel essential oil in pectin-based coatings reduced the quality loss. Also, higher antimicrobial effects were observed in nanoemulsion-coated orange slices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microemulsion and nanoemulsion coatings raised pH and titratable acidity of orange slices above controls and pectin-coated slices.

Taxon
orangee0
Treatment
coated samples containing microemulsion and nanoemulsione1
Outcome
pH and titratable aciditye1
Direction
significantly highere1
Comparator
controls and pectin-coated slicese1

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of orange slices stored at 4 °C for 17 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–220 · show in text ↑
e1

“The variations of pH and titratable acidity in coated samples containing microemulsion and nanoemulsion were significantly higher than the controls and pectin-coated slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–394 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble solids increased most in control orange slices.

Taxon
orangee0
Outcome
increases of the total soluble solidse2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
in controlse2

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of orange slices stored at 4 °C for 17 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest and lowest increases of the total soluble solids were observed in controls and 1% OPEO nanoemulsion samples, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1% OPEO nanoemulsion coating gave the lowest total soluble solids increase in orange slices.

Taxon
orangee0
Treatment
1% OPEO nanoemulsion samplese2
Outcome
increases of the total soluble solidse2
Direction
loweste2
Comparator
controlse2

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of orange slices stored at 4 °C for 17 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest and lowest increases of the total soluble solids were observed in controls and 1% OPEO nanoemulsion samples, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight and ascorbic acid losses of all coated orange slices were significantly lower than in controls.

Taxon
orangee0
Treatment
all coated samplese4
Outcome
weight and ascorbic acid lossese4
Direction
significantly lowere4
Comparator
controlse4

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of orange slices stored at 4 °C for 17 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–220 · show in text ↑
e4

“The weight and ascorbic acid losses of all coated samples were significantly lower than the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoemulsion-coated orange slices showed higher antibacterial and antifungal effects.

Taxon
orangee0
Treatment
nanoemulsion-coated samplese5
Outcome
antibacterial and antifungal effectse5
Direction
Highere5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of orange slices stored at 4 °C for 17 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–220 · show in text ↑
e5

“Higher antibacterial and antifungal effects were observed in the nanoemulsion-coated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microemulsion and nanoemulsion coatings showed no significant differences in sensory evaluation.

Taxon
orangee0
Treatment
samples coated with microemulsion and nanoemulsione6
Outcome
sensory evaluatione6
Direction
no significant differencese6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of orange slices stored at 4 °C for 17 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–220 · show in text ↑
e6

“In sensory evaluation, no significant differences were observed in the samples coated with microemulsion and nanoemulsion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoemulsion-based coatings with OPEO can extend the shelf life of orange slices without undesirable sensory impacts.

Taxon
orangee0
Treatment
nanoemulsion-based edible coatings containing OPEOe7
Outcome
shelf lifee7
Direction
extende7
Qualifier
without any undesirable impacts on sensory attributese7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters of orange slices stored at 4 °C for 17 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–220 · show in text ↑
e7

“The results showed that the nanoemulsion-based edible coatings containing OPEO can extend the shelf life of orange slices without any undesirable impacts on sensory attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1025 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · quality: general · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.