Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The Nano-NPK and yeast extract interaction gave the best results in leaf K content compared with the control.

A claim from Effect of Foliar Spray with Nano-NPK Fertilizer and Yeast Extract on Growth of Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.) Washington Navel Variety · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Nano-NPK and yeast extract interaction gave the best results in leaf K content compared with the control.

Taxon
C. sinensisCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
Nano-NPK and yeast extracte2
Outcome
K leaves contente2
Direction
best resultse2
Comparator
control treatmente2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–107
e2

“the interaction treatment (N3Y3) at the highest level of both of Nano-NPK and yeast extract showed the best results in the percentage of dry matter, N, P and K leaves content while the control treatment was the least for all the studied characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1458

Title

Effect of Foliar Spray with Nano-NPK Fertilizer and Yeast Extract on Growth of Orange (C. sinensis L. Osb.) Washington Navel Variety

S. M. Jubeir; A. Q. Hamdan; S. M. Turkan IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2023. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1158/4/042052

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-1f40715c851d64bb0dac58624d07142cc205c580ca8b6af4af352aaf3f50676a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.