Paper · 2023 · Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research

Effect of Different Post-harvest Treatments on Shelf Life and Quality of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck.) Fruit#

A.M. Virkar; V.K. Garande

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Several post-harvest treatments are used for extension of storage life of sweet orange fruits. The present investigation was carried out at Department of Horticulture, MPKV, Rahuri, during 2019-20 and 2020-21 in order to study the effect of different packaging materials and storage conditions on quality and shelf life of fresh fruit of sweet orange cv. Phule Mosambi. Methods: The experiment consists of six types of packaging materials viz., P1- Plyethylene bags (150 gauge), P2- PE paper coating bags, P3- LDPE (200 gauge), P4- Cotton bags, P5- Aluminum foil bags, P6- Nano silver-based bags and untreated control under two storage conditions viz., S1- Room temperature (RT) and S2- Cold storage (CS, 12±2°C and 90% RH) in Factorial Completely Randomized Design (FCRD) with three replications. Result: The data revealed that, the sweet orange fruits packed in nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storage i.e. P6S2 recorded significantly lowest PLW (7.81%) and spoilage (4.18%) with highest firmness (10.87 N), juice content (46.59%) and overall acceptability (8.73) at the end of storage life of 60 days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet orange fruits in nano silver-based bags under cold storage had the lowest PLW (7.81%).

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Material
Phule Mosambie2
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storagee1
Outcome
PLWe1
Direction
loweste1
Value
7.81%e1
Setting
Rahurie2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the sweet orange fruits packed in nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storage i.e. P6S2 recorded significantly lowest PLW (7.81%) and spoilage (4.18%) with highest firmness (10.87 N), juice content (46.59%) and overall acceptability (8.73) at the end of storage life of 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1125 · show in text ↑
e2

“The present investigation was carried out at Department of Horticulture, MPKV, Rahuri, during 2019-20 and 2020-21 in order to study the effect of different packaging materials and storage conditions on quality and shelf life of fresh fruit of sweet orange cv. Phule Mosambi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet orange fruits in nano silver-based bags under cold storage had the lowest spoilage (4.18%).

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Material
Phule Mosambie2
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storagee1
Outcome
spoilagee1
Direction
loweste1
Value
4.18%e1
Setting
Rahurie2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the sweet orange fruits packed in nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storage i.e. P6S2 recorded significantly lowest PLW (7.81%) and spoilage (4.18%) with highest firmness (10.87 N), juice content (46.59%) and overall acceptability (8.73) at the end of storage life of 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1125 · show in text ↑
e2

“The present investigation was carried out at Department of Horticulture, MPKV, Rahuri, during 2019-20 and 2020-21 in order to study the effect of different packaging materials and storage conditions on quality and shelf life of fresh fruit of sweet orange cv. Phule Mosambi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet orange fruits in nano silver-based bags under cold storage had the highest firmness (10.87 N).

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Material
Phule Mosambie2
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storagee1
Outcome
firmnesse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
10.87 Ne1
Setting
Rahurie2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the sweet orange fruits packed in nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storage i.e. P6S2 recorded significantly lowest PLW (7.81%) and spoilage (4.18%) with highest firmness (10.87 N), juice content (46.59%) and overall acceptability (8.73) at the end of storage life of 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1125 · show in text ↑
e2

“The present investigation was carried out at Department of Horticulture, MPKV, Rahuri, during 2019-20 and 2020-21 in order to study the effect of different packaging materials and storage conditions on quality and shelf life of fresh fruit of sweet orange cv. Phule Mosambi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet orange fruits in nano silver-based bags under cold storage had the highest juice content (46.59%).

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Material
Phule Mosambie2
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storagee1
Outcome
juice contente1
Direction
higheste1
Value
46.59%e1
Setting
Rahurie2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the sweet orange fruits packed in nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storage i.e. P6S2 recorded significantly lowest PLW (7.81%) and spoilage (4.18%) with highest firmness (10.87 N), juice content (46.59%) and overall acceptability (8.73) at the end of storage life of 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1125 · show in text ↑
e2

“The present investigation was carried out at Department of Horticulture, MPKV, Rahuri, during 2019-20 and 2020-21 in order to study the effect of different packaging materials and storage conditions on quality and shelf life of fresh fruit of sweet orange cv. Phule Mosambi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet orange fruits in nano silver-based bags under cold storage had the highest overall acceptability (8.73).

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Material
Phule Mosambie2
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storagee1
Outcome
overall acceptabilitye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
8.73e1
Setting
Rahurie2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the sweet orange fruits packed in nano silver-based bags and stored at cold storage i.e. P6S2 recorded significantly lowest PLW (7.81%) and spoilage (4.18%) with highest firmness (10.87 N), juice content (46.59%) and overall acceptability (8.73) at the end of storage life of 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1125 · show in text ↑
e2

“The present investigation was carried out at Department of Horticulture, MPKV, Rahuri, during 2019-20 and 2020-21 in order to study the effect of different packaging materials and storage conditions on quality and shelf life of fresh fruit of sweet orange cv. Phule Mosambi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–380 · show in text ↑

cold · quality: general · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

cold · molecular: metabolites · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: general · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cold · quality: postharvest · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

storage · quality: general · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

storage · molecular: metabolites · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.