Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pearl millet plus green gram had the highest pearl millet equivalent yield.

A claim from Effect of Intercropping and Fertility Levels on Yield Attributes, Yield and Economics of Summer Pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) under South Gujarat Condition · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet plus green gram had the highest pearl millet equivalent yield.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
pearl millet + green gram (I2) intercropping systeme0
Outcome
pearl millet equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pearl millet equivalent yield was significantly highest in pearl millet + green gram (I2) intercropping system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–790

Title

Effect of Intercropping and Fertility Levels on Yield Attributes, Yield and Economics of Summer Pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) under South Gujarat Condition

K. R. Patel J. D. Thanki; P. H. Kalal International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2021. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1006.065

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-2bdb304f75c751d07a500ab38386a288a2e63ff0a03dc2125ba30670393060ee · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

60 papers: 47 positive, 13 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.