Paper · 2024 · Asian Plant Research Journal

Economic Analysis, Yield Optimization, and Competition Dynamics of Groundnut/Cereal Fodder Intercropping Systems in Pakistan's Semi Arid Tropics

Abaid Ur Rehman Nasir; Gill Ammara; Muhammad Zeeshan Hussain; et al.

12
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This research focuses on the intercropping management options including aspects of yield performance, nitrogen contribution to groundnut and economical considerations through the usage of intercrop Maize, Sorghum and Pearl Millet under varying cuttings treatments. Intercropping is effective in increasing land productivity and efficiency in nutrient use and provides economic returns yet the best combinations have not been well explored. Randomised complete block design was used to assess the growth characteristics of plant height, modulation and nitrogen in sole cropping and intercropping treatments in which they make cuts. For sole crop, both, maize and pearl millet produced the highest green fodder yields of 13.40 t ha⁻¹ and 19.10 t ha⁻¹, respectively, and intercropping reduced the productivity for both crops but it was statistically significant, yield recorded in Maize (one cut) groundnut = 3.10 t ha⁻¹. Both nodulation and nitrogen content were maximum in sole groundnut, but they were lower when groundnut was grown in association with other crops. Among all competitive indices, the LER was the highest on maize (LER=1.72), pearl millet and sorghum indicated that intercropping enhances land use efficiency. This was facilitated by the Monetary Advantage Index (MAI) that provided much support to maize-groundnut intercrop, which was easily identified as the most appropriate option for inter-crop revenue generation with an MAI of Rs. 17,800. These results provide evidence for the suitability of maize as the best intercrop for the enhancement of productivity and profitability in groundnut based intercropping systems. This study adds valuable input to sustainable agriculture, particularly in that it expresses the yields and profits from distinct intercrop associations as numeral digits deemed useful by both the scientific and agricultural communities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize yielded 13.40 t ha⁻¹ green fodder.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
green fodder yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.40 t ha⁻¹e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For sole crop, both, maize and pearl millet produced the highest green fodder yields of 13.40 t ha⁻¹ and 19.10 t ha⁻¹, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–762 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole pearl millet yielded 19.10 t ha⁻¹ green fodder.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
green fodder yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
19.10 t ha⁻¹e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For sole crop, both, maize and pearl millet produced the highest green fodder yields of 13.40 t ha⁻¹ and 19.10 t ha⁻¹, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced maize fodder productivity significantly.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping reduced the productivity for both crops but it was statistically significant, yield recorded in Maize (one cut) groundnut = 3.10 t ha⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced pearl millet fodder productivity significantly.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping reduced the productivity for both crops but it was statistically significant, yield recorded in Maize (one cut) groundnut = 3.10 t ha⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–917 · show in text ↑
e1

“For sole crop, both, maize and pearl millet produced the highest green fodder yields of 13.40 t ha⁻¹ and 19.10 t ha⁻¹, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–762 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut yield with one-cut maize intercrop was 3.10 t ha⁻¹.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
3.10 t ha⁻¹e0
Qualifier
Maize (one cut)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield recorded in Maize (one cut) groundnut = 3.10 t ha⁻¹”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–917 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole groundnut had maximum nodulation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both nodulation and nitrogen content were maximum in sole groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–986 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole groundnut had maximum nitrogen content.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
nitrogen contente0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both nodulation and nitrogen content were maximum in sole groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped groundnut had lower nodulation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
grown in association with other cropse0
Outcome
nodulatione1
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they were lower when groundnut was grown in association with other crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1064 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both nodulation and nitrogen content were maximum in sole groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped groundnut had lower nitrogen content.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
grown in association with other cropse0
Outcome
nitrogen contente1
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they were lower when groundnut was grown in association with other crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1064 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both nodulation and nitrogen content were maximum in sole groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–986 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize intercrop had the highest LER at 1.72.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.72e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the LER was the highest on maize (LER=1.72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize-groundnut intercrop had a monetary advantage index of Rs. 17,800.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
MAIe0
Value
Rs. 17,800e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize-groundnut intercrop, which was easily identified as the most appropriate option for inter-crop revenue generation with an MAI of Rs. 17,800.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1461 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend maize as the best groundnut intercrop for productivity and profitability.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
maize as the best intercrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suitability of maize as the best intercrop for the enhancement of productivity and profitability in groundnut based intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1639 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

60 papers: 47 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.