Intervention effectmodel-written summary

July paclobutrazol advanced fruit harvest by 22 days.

A claim from Influence of paclobutrazol on growth, yield and quality of mango · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

July paclobutrazol advanced fruit harvest by 22 days.

Material
BARI Mango-3 (Amrapali)e1
Treatment
Paclobutrazol soil drenched @ 7500 ppm or 10000 ppm on 15 Julye0
Outcome
fruit harveste0
Direction
advancede0
Value
22 dayse0
Comparator
control (water application)e2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paclobutrazol soil drenched @ 7500 ppm or 10000 ppm on 15 July distinctly advanced panicle emergence and fruit harvest by 23 and 22 days, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–578
e1

“mango cv. BARI Mango-3 (Amrapali)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–129
e2

“control (water application)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–312

Title

Influence of paclobutrazol on growth, yield and quality of mango

BC Sarker; MA Rahim Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 2018. doi:10.3329/bjar.v43i1.36154

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2c2dcfa25eced4774e8fd6286599959b551df986dbbdf6bd148c7584d5535c6e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

paclobutrazol · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

application · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.