Intervention effectmodel-written summary

OPT and OPTM increased agronomic NUE by 32.81-43.01% over FFP.

A claim from Determining optimal nitrogen management to improve rice yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency based on multi‐index decision analysis method · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT and OPTM increased agronomic NUE by 32.81-43.01% over FFP.

Treatment
OPT and OPTM treatmente0
Outcome
agronomic NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32.81-43.01%e0
Comparator
FFP treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“agronomic NUE (AE) and N partial factor productivity (PFP) under OPT and OPTM treatment were also remarkably increased by 32.81-43.01% and 28.59-33.28% with respect to the value under FFP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1165
t0

“rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–61

Title

Determining optimal nitrogen management to improve rice yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency based on multi‐index decision analysis method

Liwei Fei; Junjie Guo; Wenbo Liu; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2023. doi:10.1002/jsfa.12452

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2c9ec2b85d01bbfc04478a4a95c457a1527929310f18bdeb9bb5a91a32481fd9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

211 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.